Executive Comp Advisors

Golden Parachutes and 280G

Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code imposes a 20% excise tax on "excess parachute payments" — golden parachute amounts that exceed 3× your "base amount." For senior executives at companies being acquired, getting the 280G analysis wrong can cost hundreds of thousands.

The 280G framework

Base amount = your average W-2 compensation over the 5 years before the change-of-control year (or your full compensation history if shorter). Simplified: a CFO with $500K base + $500K bonus averaging $1M/yr for 5 years has a $1M base amount.

Parachute payments = any compensation contingent on the change-of-control that, together with payments to other disqualified individuals, is at least 3× your base amount. Includes:

If parachute payments exceed 3× base amount: a 20% excise tax applies to the amount exceeding 1× base amount (not just the excess over 3× — this is the gotcha). Plus the company loses the tax deduction on that portion.

A worked example

CFO, $1M base amount, COC triggers:
  • Severance: $2M (2× base + target bonus)
  • Accelerated RSU vesting value at COC: $3M
  • NQDC enhanced distribution: $500K
  • Total parachute payments: $5.5M

Is this over 3× base amount? $5.5M / $1M = 5.5×. Yes.

Excess over 1× base amount = $5.5M - $1M = $4.5M.

20% excise tax: $900K — paid by the executive personally, in addition to regular income tax on the full $5.5M.

Combined tax burden: $900K excise + ~$2M regular income tax = ~$2.9M on a $5.5M payment. Take-home: $2.6M, effective 52% tax.

Mitigation strategies

1. Cutback provisions

Your employment agreement or change-of-control plan may include a cutback: "parachute payments shall be reduced to 2.99× base amount if such reduction results in higher after-tax net to the executive." This is the cleanest mitigation — just don't trigger 280G. Most modern executive agreements include it.

2. Tax gross-ups (rare now)

Prior to ~2008, common: the company reimburses the executive for the excise tax. Shareholders hate these, so they've largely been eliminated. If yours has one, keep it.

3. Pre-COC deferrals and adjustments

If you have visibility into an upcoming COC (which itself is regulated — be careful about MNPI), pre-COC NQDC deferrals and election changes can reduce parachute exposure. Must be done 12+ months in advance under 409A.

4. Reasonable comp documentation

Payments explicitly for personal services post-COC ("consulting for 12 months after") are NOT parachute payments. Documenting continued services structure reduces the parachute amount.

5. Mixed grant timing

Stock grants vested BEFORE the change-of-control aren't parachute payments. Stock that vests BECAUSE of the COC is. Companies that manage vesting cadence thoughtfully spread exposure.

When 280G doesn't apply

Analyze your 280G exposure

If M&A is on the horizon, a specialist advisor can model your parachute exposure now — before you lose negotiating leverage. Free match.